No announcement yet.

What is Wrong with Men These Days - Mark Passio

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What is Wrong with Men These Days - Mark Passio

    Yes, yes, it is very long. What I find interesting is that Passio knows about the manosphere and highly disagrees with the concept of female nature. He attributes all of this stuff to the social conditioning society is under.

    I used to think collapse was inevitable. Now I realize it is necessary.

    It was only a matter of time before the bicycles realized that they in fact did not need the fish.

  • #2
    does seem to be a few ppl now tying leftist socialist feminist PC, to dissatisfaction Brexit, trump, mra, mgtow, French riots.

    Jordan Peterson has a good prageru vid, whos teaching your kids, that explains the Marxist rise.

    its nice to see rebellion, and there is truth in that its not just feminist gynocentricism that's affecting men, big socialist government is killing men as providers and business ppl, and as capitalists......undermining us as fathers or even members of our family.

    simple fact is capitalist free enterprise free market, free speech, free press, and small govt works best.....and increasingly the traditional family model appears the most satisfactory for most ppl.

    it certainly did seem to be mra and mgtow that were first to lose faith in the status quo, but id agree, Marxist socialist engineering is the cancer, feminism just one of its tools

    if you were born mid sixties gen x, you certainly got to see the rise of social engineering and pay the price for would be nice to think some of us will see its end

    it was funny how he said women would fuck a Nazi one day, and an American gi the next, whoever had the resources. methinks academia, the press, and politicians, are just as slutty...….some hope for a nonapocalyptic change anyway.
    Last edited by menrppl2; 01-08-2019, 01:06 AM.
    A man can gain no more respect than by, laying down his life for a woman. And a woman, no more than by, beating down a man. For a man to ask, what is fair and good and true and just, is to offend.


    • #3
      I think his biggest error is his position that human action is all nurture, and no nature. As he says, he doesn't have kids, so he has not seen the radical way two siblings react to nearly identical upbringing and circumstances. Likewise, he attributes all toxic female behavior to manipulation. He is ignoring that we all have an animal nature that is guided by our reptilian brain.
      I used to think collapse was inevitable. Now I realize it is necessary.

      It was only a matter of time before the bicycles realized that they in fact did not need the fish.


      • #4

        Couldn't make it past 11 minutes.

        Bland, Superficial, a mix of obvious "no shit sherlock" + "facts" with little or no citation (which were probably correct, just not prefaced with "our studies show that" or referencing his nonexistant credentials.)

        His credentials wouldn't matter if he were saying something new or innovative, however regurgitating red pill orthodoxy without clout is kind of like watching Roosh give a public speech about what women REALLY want.

        Well, it may very well be true, but the people who will accept it at face value have already been in the game, and everybody else is like, "Well what's your proof? Where's the studies?"

        So in the end you're just preaching to the people who already believed in what you were saying before you started talking.

        It doesn't reach anybody new.

        It doesn't enlighten the oldbies with any new information.

        And yeah the whole "this is LEARNED BEHAVIOR" needs citation.

        You think it's learned behavior that women sleep with winners? That they seldom go around sleeping with homeless men who failed at life or defeated guys in the throes of depression? You think that's a learned behavior, really?

        If you want to understand female behavior, all you have to do is remove the fact that she's female.

        "Do women like boring guys?"
        I dunno, do YOU like boring guys?

        If you were hanging around with some guy that was boring, that spoke in monotone, make lame jokes, was annoying to be around, would you continue to hang around with them?

        If you wouldn't "date" him then why do you expect some women to "date" him.

        You think she has some special "woman brain" that defines boring and monotone differently than you do?

        I wouldn't go drinking with a hopelessly depressed person crying into his beer.
        Why would a woman do that?

        You think she has a special brain that likes to hang around with hopelessly depressed guys crying into their beer?

        Just take away the fact that she's a woman.
        And say to yourself, "Would I like to date me?"

        Maybe not in a sexual way, but would you hang out with you? Would you drink with you? Would you go to the movies with you?

        No, you wouldn't, because you're fuckin boring and haggard and depressing.

        And that's exactly how she feels about it too.

        The fact that she has a pussy and you have a cock doesn't mean you have different brains that perceive "boring" differently, she doesn't see deep inside your soul to your "inner masculinity" or something.

        A bum looks like a bum.
        A happy, confident successful dude who pumps iron looks like a happy, confident successful dude who pumps iron.

        You'd want to hang out with him and have a beer with him.
        And so would the women.

        Game is not that complicated.

        It's not psychobabble or voodoo.

        Game postulates that when you get your shit together, people want to hang out with you, and if those people happen to be female they usually wanna fuck you.

        Game is about as controversial as telling someone to go take a shower, brush you fucking teeth, learn how to hold a conversation, have some self respect, stop supplicating to women like a fucking slave and agreeing with everything they say, be yourself, unless your self sucks, the way they say it in game is be your BEST self, the best VERSION of yourself.

        Because somewhere deep inside is the loser you, the haggard you, the boring you.
        There is also the successful you, the you that enjoys life and has his shit together.

        That's the "you" you want to be.
        Authentically you, unapolgetically you, on top of the world.

        That's game.

        And that's who guys like to drink with.
        And those who women like to sleep with.

        It's not "learned behavior" never was, never will be.

        If you're in a prison camp.
        And some "ally" has a can of spam.
        Guess who I'm hanging out with.
        Cuz I'm hungry, I need a sandwich.
        I'll still visit you at the prison camp and try to sneak you some food.
        But hunger is painful, it gnaws at you and grinds at you, it's torture.
        Everybody has a breaking point, everybody.

        "How did they break you?"
        "They gave me a grasshopper."
        "A grasshopper?!?"
        "Yeah, it's 2 parts gin, 2 part brandy, 1 part creme de mint..."


        • #5
          I pretty much couldn't get passed the title:

          The Unholy Feminine - Neofeminism and the Statanic Epi-Eugenics Agenda.
          If I find time maybe I'll watch, but I have a sneaking suspicion that I'm not in his target audience.
          "...but when she goes off you, she will not just walk away, she will walk away with your fucking skin in a jar." ~~ DoctorRandomercam
          "The laws of man, they don't apply when blood gets in a woman's eye" - The Black Keys


          • #6
            Actually kind of the point. His audience is not at all the "red pill" community. Although he is very critical of the new age movement, people in those circles are sort of his target demographic. One of his chief arguments is that the new age movement is just as bad as all other religions with respect to the fact that they guide people to a state of inaction. This is the goal of the powers that be. Get people to think that taking no action is the appropriate response to all of the evil in the world. Non judgement etc... He's fighting against that.

            The fact that he is hitting these hippy types of people with red pill truths is the bit that is new and interesting.

            Also, I disagree with him plenty on lots of stuff. As I've already stated, he doesn't seem to think that toxic femininity has anything to do with female nature. Either that, or he is sly enough to put that sugar in the medicine to get his audience to swallow it. In any case, I'm pretty sure this is the first time most of the people in his audience have ever heard terms like misandry, or even considered anything feminine to be in any way toxic.

            He is in fact, not speaking to the choir in any way. This alone makes this presentation unique.
            I used to think collapse was inevitable. Now I realize it is necessary.

            It was only a matter of time before the bicycles realized that they in fact did not need the fish.